Glancing at last week's schedule, it seemed to be one of the season's easiest to pick. Turns out it was. With three of our pickers going 13-for-14, another with just two misses, and only one staffer who couldn't quite reach double-digit wins, it was a week for the Pick'em record books.
Nathan, of course, put in one of the 13-1 cards and again extended his lead over a faltering Khaled while Steve quietly pushed his way up another step. Mr. Palazzolo now sits just a game back of second place.
Ten of Week 11's 14 games saw a consensus (or near consensus) and those picks paid off once again. The five consensus picks all came through — and that batch raised our season mark to 49-10 (83%) — but now, for the first time this season, we've got no such selections.
So, what do you think? Are there any potential winners here that should have been a consensus?
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben | John | Khaled | Nathan | Neil | Rick | Sam | Steve | ||
| HOU @ DET |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WAS @ DAL |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| NE @ NYJ |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| OAK @ CIN |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
| PIT @ CLE |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BUF @ IND |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TEN @ JAX |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DEN @ KC |  |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MIN@ CHI |  |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ATL @ TB |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| SEA @ MIA |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| BAL @ SD |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SF @ NO |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| STL @ ARZ |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| GB @ NYG |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CAR @ PHI |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ben | John | Khaled | Nathan | Neil | Rick | Sam | Steve | ||
| This week: | 11-5 | 7-9 | 7-9 | 10-6 | 11-5 | 9-7 | 12-4 | 10-6 | |
| 2012: | 112-64 | 100-76 | 111-65 | 120-56 | 111-65 | 106-70 | 114-62 | 113-63 | |
| 2012 Win %: | 63.4% | 57.1% | 63.4% | 68.6% | 62.9% | 60.0% | 64.6% | 64.0% |
© 2024 PFF - all rights reserved.