2011 Elusive Rating

| 5 years ago

2011 Elusive Rating

Which running backs did the best job with the ball in their hands in 2011? That question can be incredibly difficult to answer and is often based on some very misleading numbers.

Rushing yards and touchdowns are nice, but they can’t separate the job of the running back from the blocking in front of him, and many times are more indicative of the offense in general than the individual runner.

At Pro Football Focus we try and go deeper than that, and the Elusive Rating Signature Stat is our attempt at isolating the performance of a runner from his blockers by looking at what he does on each play.  


Yards After Contact

When looking at a running back’s work beyond his blockers, one of the measures that is factored into the Elusive Rating formula is his yards after contact on rushing plays. Two players were way out ahead of the pack in terms of total yards after contact, with Maurice Jones-Drew and Michael Turner both rushing for over 900 yards after being met by the first defender. That’s significantly more than 50% of the total rushing output for both players, but neither ranked inside the Top 5 in terms of yards after contact per rush. Topping that list was Buffalo’s Fred Jackson, who managed 3.75 yards per carry after contact, the best mark in the NFL by a margin, and almost a full yard more per carry than most running backs.

At the tailing end of the scale, we see Thomas Jones, who really should be used as some form of offensive line calibration tool, because he gets exactly what is there, and very little else. He was able to record just 1.4 yards after contact per carry, which is more than half a yard worse than any other running back in the study. Interestingly for Cincinnati, they appear to be trading one player from the Bottom 5 for another, with both Cedric Benson and BenJarvus Green-Ellis posting identical figures in average yards after contact.

One of the players in line to replace Green-Ellis in New England is all the way back at the top end of the scale, inside the Top 10.  Stevan Ridley had just 87 carries in the 2011 regular season, but averaged over three yards per carry after contact, a full yard more than the player whose carries he may be receiving in 2012.

Perhaps the most interesting thing this list throws up, though, is the after-contact work done by Darren Sproles. Sproles is often seen as just a return man and a scat back; great in space, but not likely to break anything open if that space isn’t there. He posted the second-best mark in the NFL with 3.67 yards per run coming after contact. He is certainly not asked to pound it much between the tackles, and so the contact that he receives is always substantially less likely than having to fight through defensive tackles, but it’s a point worth making, nonetheless.


Missed Tackles

The next step toward honing in on a running back’s performance is how many times he forces missed tackles. This can range from running right through a would-be tackler, to juking a guy out of his jock and running clean past him without making strong contact.  These missed tackles don’t necessarily have to include contact for that reason, but almost always do.

Michael Turner again found himself at the sharp end of this particular statistic, leading the league with a massive 62 missed tackles forced on his runs, and another five on receptions out of the backfield. That total of 67 wasn’t just a league-leading mark in 2011, but it is comfortably the highest mark we have tallied since we’ve been recording the statistic, beating the previous mark of 63 set by DeAngelo Williams in 2008. Turner is given a massive workload by the Falcons, and he may not be the explosive breakaway threat some other runners are, but he does an incredible amount of the heavy lifting all by himself, and his work this season with the Falcons’ offensive line weaker than in previous years speaks volumes of his quality.

LeSean McCoy and Jones-Drew both posted 58 total missed tackles forced and Seattle’s Marshawn Lynch was only one behind with 57, but perhaps the most impressive mark was from Jonathan Stewart of the Panthers. Stewart only carried the ball 142 times (less than half of the carries of some of the players ahead of him, but he forced 32 missed tackles as a runner and added another 20 on his receptions for a total of 52. The Panthers have brought in Mike Tolbert in free agency this year to potentially replace Stewart if they can’t lock him down long-term, but they may not fully appreciate exactly how capable he is of making plays independent of the blocking in front of him. If Stewart makes it to the open market next offseason, he may not be in line for big money given the way running backs are viewed in today’s league, but he will make a huge impact wherever he ends up.

With his standing reservation at the other end of the table, we again encounter Thomas Jones, who set new benchmarks for futility.  Jones touched the ball 158 times last season, and was able to force just five missed tackles, an astoundingly poor mark that goes a long way to explaining why he was our lowest-graded runner on the season with a -5.4. He was never a back that did a lot by himself, but over the past few seasons Jones has lost what athletic ability he once had, and now remains a player who merely picks the right holes and advances the football until the blocking reaches its end.


The Elusive Rating

The magic formula: (MTrush + MTrec) / (Rec + Att) * (YCo / Att * 100) 

We’ve now been running the Elusive Rating numbers for four seasons, and there have been a few names that consistently appear near the top of the rankings, usually players that at one time or another have been classed as ‘underrated’.  Pierre Thomas has showed consistently well, as have Fred Jackson and Jonathan Stewart. All three of those players again cracked the Top 10 in 2011, with Thomas in eighth position, again topping a crowded Saints backfield. Jackson and Stewart took things to another level and finished the season 1-2 in the NFL. Stewart had a rating of 81.2 and Jackson 80.7, as the pair were way out ahead of the pack. Turner ranked third with a rating more than fifteen points lower at 64.3–his rating dragged down by sheer weight of carries as the workhorse of the Atlanta backfield.

Jackson’s season in particular deserves some focus, because he was leading the way in the Elusive Rating standings for much of the season until injury ended his year prematurely. He had been coming back to the pack a little before he went down, but it’s a pity that we didn’t get to see what he could have achieved had he stayed healthy all season. Stewart is a regular in the Top 5 of the study and his value is only reinforced with a second ER title in four seasons.

This season, the top of the table was bereft of heavy-workload running backs, as the league trends back toward backfields by committee. Turner is the only one in the Top 10 to have more than 200 carries, and many of the league’s most-worked runners aligned at the foot of the chart. It is a testament to the performances of both Turner and Jones-Drew–the only pair of runners this season to top 300 carries–that they both scored so well in the Elusive Rating.

Tampa Bay’s LeGarrette Blount may have fallen out of favor with Raheem Morris, but after tearing up the league in 2010, he again showed well despite being kept off the field more than he should have been this season. Blount forced 41 total missed tackles (most of which seemed to come against the Packers on a single run), and notched 2.9 yards per carry after contact. He may not be an accomplished receiver out of the backfield or the best blocking back in the league, but he is too big a weapon for the Bucs to be keeping him on the bench, especially as a punitive measure for fumbling.

It goes without saying at this point that the table is propped up by Thomas Jones, and he is some way adrift of the rest of the pack with an Elusive Rating of 4.5; 10 clear points below anybody else. Five other players scored an Elusive Rating under 20, and three of them have been looking for new teams this offseason. Ricky Williams has retired from the NFL, perhaps at the right time given his showing last season, but Cedric Benson, Joseph Addai, and Peyton Hillis were all free agents, and two of them remain on the market with minimal interest. Hillis is the only one to be signed, and he has been given some slack due to how much of last season he played hurt.


Looking to the Future

In the past, the Elusive Rating has shown some predictive ability. Distilling a runner’s performance from the offensive line allows you to have an idea what will happen to that player’s production if anything happens to the blocking in front of him, good or bad. A player that carries a poor Elusive Rating may put up impressive statistics one year rushing behind a good blocking unit, but then find that blocking disappear the next season and be unable to take up the slack.

Michael Bush put up healthy numbers last season for the Raiders and was given healthy money this season by the Chicago Bears, who may be seeking to place leverage on Matt Forte in his contract negotiations. While the Raiders had a reasonable offensive line, the Bears had a terrible unit last year, and yet Forte ranked just outside the Top 10 with an ER of 52.6. By contrast, and despite the much better blocking in front of him, Bush managed a rating of just 20.2. Chicago might be looking for Bush to help them prove they can move the ball well without Forte, but unless the line improves dramatically, they’re likely to find out just how impressive Forte has been in that environment.

It’s tough to evaluate the performance of a running back statistically, and numbers aren’t everything in the NFL, but looking at the right ones certainly helps. Below are the best and worst among qualifying runners in PFF’s 2011 Elusive Rating:


Top 15, 2011 Elusive Rating

#NameTeamAttemptsReceptionsYco/AttMT RushMT RecElusive Rating
1Jonathan StewartCAR142472.95322081.2
2Fred JacksonBUF170393.75341180.7
3Michael TurnerATL301173.0562564.3
4James StarksGB133292.67271061.0
5Toby GerhartMIN109232.9723460.8
6LeGarrette BlountTB184152.9034759.8
6Isaac RedmanPIT110183.0620559.8
8Pierre ThomasNO110502.87201359.2
9Felix JonesDAL127332.9823756.0
10Ben TateHST175133.3430155.1
11Matt ForteCHI203522.68391152.6
12Ahmad BradshawNYG171342.53261651.8
13Darren SprolesNO87863.6717750.9
14Adrian L. PetersonMIN208183.1333248.4
15Marshawn LynchSEA285282.5352546.1


Bottom 15, 2011 Elusive Rating

#NameTeamAttemptsReceptionsYco/AttMT RushMT RecElusive Rating
42Steven JacksonSL259422.5623423.0
43BenJarvus Green-EllisNE18192.0619222.7
43Dexter McClusterKC113472.1313422.7
45Jackie BattleKC14992.6511221.8
46Mark IngramNO122112.0611321.7
47Shonn GreeneNYJ253302.2522521.5
48Ray RiceBLT291762.48171420.9
49Cadillac WilliamsSL87152.647120.7
50Michael BushOAK256372.3719620.2
51Ricky WilliamsBLT108132.568119.0
52Peyton HillisCLV161222.3912116.9
53Daniel ThomasMIA165121.9411416.4
53Joseph AddaiIND118152.1810016.4
55Cedric BensonCIN273152.0621115.8
56Thomas JonesKC15351.42414.5


Follow Sam on Twitter: @SamMonson … and main feed too: @ProFootbalFocus

| Senior Analyst

Sam is a Senior Analyst at Pro Football Focus, as well as a contributor to ESPN and NBCSports.

  • Calcos

    I’ve always though Ray Rice was a bit overrated but by this stat he is quite bad. I can’t believe this to be true, are his numbers just a product of the massive amount of touches he gets? If so then why should the Ravens pay him when they could bring in another RB and pay him a lot less.

    • FootballFan

      Rice logged 4.7 ypc but is completely dependant on his blockers unlike someone like Adrian Peterson who will get 4.5 ypc regardless of who is in front of him. Rice’s value comes from his 70+ receptions.

  • aankit

    Have you guys thought about adding a variance measure per touch? Something like RB John Doe has an ER of 40.0 +/- 5.0 while RB John Smith has an ER of 40.0 +/- 3.0. In this case Smith is more predictable touch to touch?

    Adjusting for run defense seems like it may also be predictive – i.e. indexing run defenses on the same statistics YCO and MT – and then finding the lift a particular RBs ER provided versus what that run DEF typically gives up. It would at least be fun look at ER by DEF for each RB…

    • aankit

      like, and this is just hearsay, but I feel like there is probably a more significant difference between Redman and Thomas in terms of consistency per touch, just on watching those guys, albeit on limited sunday ticket super watching.

      • http://www.profootballfocus.com Sam Monson

        I think both are pretty interesting ideas, but you start getting into a very small sample size in either instance, which I suspect takes away largely from the statistical significance of the numbers.

  • lurkmenace

    This is where the statistical analysis can be misleading. When I see the explanation of Forte and running behind an inferior line it further proves this. When Forte went down Bell and Barber were able to keep the Bears running game going strong. In my opinion (through watching all of their games) the Bears O-line is actually a good run blocking line regardless of their run block rating. I see the bad grades each individual on the line received in that area and that just simply does not represent their run blocking efficiency on the field. Forte is no doubt a great back, but he did not perform despite his line, he performed well with his line. Pass blocking is a different story as they are as bad as advertised. Just my opinion.

    • http://www.profootballfocus.com Sam Monson

      Barber also scored pretty well in the Elusive Rating and actually ran well himself bar the game-losing fumbles, and bell was right behind him. All three of the Bears runners scored well and made things happen in spite of run blocking. Forte was on another level entirely compared with the other two, but the point is the drop-off wasn’t that massive.

  • tim tellean

    I’d like to see how Tebow rates. The Denver line graded so poorly (I know, I read the article).

    • uppercut

      I “second” this. It would be interesting to see write-ups on QBs & WR/TE. Even if Yards After Contact aren’t kept for them(I’d imagine they don’t face contact when running as much), then at least forced-MT%. For QBs it would be neat bonus (see who’s actually “making plays” with their legs), but for WRs (& TE to a lesser extent) it would be cool to see which players are best at “making something out of nothing” (because in today’s passing game a player who can turn short catches into medium-to-big gains would be so valuable. The short passes are easier to complete and get the ball out of your QB’s hands faster).